We must
consider public versus private money to learn how money can either be privately
public, as in central banking, or publicly private, as in Bitcoin.
Privately Public Money
The physical object representing money (like a
paper note) is public: it belongs to society. While its represented monetary
value (like that of ten dollars) is private: it belongs to whoever controls its
representing object (that paper note). Then, mistaking a representation of
money for its represented monetary value makes that representation privately
public. So any control of such a representational
monetary value, whether centralized or decentralized, must also be
privately public.
No commodity money can inherently distinguish
between itself and its represented monetary value. Hence, all commodity money
must be privately public. With directly monetary commodities (like sheer
monetary gold), private control of public monetary representations is
individual, or decentralized. However, with proxy representations of commodity
money (like receipts for deposited gold), private control of public money
becomes institutional, or centralized. Hence the privately public nature of central banks: any monetary authority must be as
privately public as the monetary representations it depends on controlling.
While conversely, any monetary representation controlled by a central authority
must be privately public.
Publicly Private Money
The Bitcoin monetary system represents any
monetary value as a private key, then metarepresents it as the corresponding
public key.
Never before a monetary representation was inherently distinct from its represented monetary value: for the first time in monetary history, controlling a private monetary value does not require any control of its public representation. With Bitcoin, a public object can represent a private monetary value without ever becoming itself private—which makes its private control by any central monetary authority not only unnecessary, but also impossible.
Never before a monetary representation was inherently distinct from its represented monetary value: for the first time in monetary history, controlling a private monetary value does not require any control of its public representation. With Bitcoin, a public object can represent a private monetary value without ever becoming itself private—which makes its private control by any central monetary authority not only unnecessary, but also impossible.
Privacy Versus Anonymity
Monetary privacy means monetary control exclusiveness:
the exclusive control of a monetary value and possibly of its public
representation. It does not necessarily mean anonymity. Anonymous monetary
control remains different from exclusive monetary control, even if helping
protect it. This way, we can have monetary privacy without having monetary
anonymity, despite not conversely.
No comments:
Post a Comment